The effects of practice on the functional anatomy of task performance
- Departments of *Neurology and Neurological Surgery, †Radiology, and ‡Anatomy and Neurobiology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO 63110; §Department of Psychology, Washington University, St. Louis, MO 63105; and ‖Department of Psychology, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA 15260
-
Figure 1
Absolute magnitudes in hypothetical brain areas (Top three graphs) during passively viewing words, reading words, and generating verbs; difference magnitudes in hypothetical brain areas (Middle three graphs) for reading minus passively viewing words and verb generation minus reading words subtractions; and difference magnitudes in brain areas of interest (Bottom three graphs) for reading minus passively viewing words and verb generating minus reading words subtractions in areas with activations related to motor output (A–C), to generating a verb (D–F), and to simple reading of words (G–I).
-
Figure 2
Median reaction times (Left) and percentage of stereotyped responses (Right) across verb generation practice blocks. Means and standard error are presented. g1–g10 represent the 10 verb generate blocks, all on the same list of 40 nouns, g1′ is verb generate on a novel list of nouns. Subjects were scanned during g1 (naive verb generate), g10 (practiced verb generate), and g1′ (novel verb generate).
-
Figure 3
PET difference (subtraction) images showing areas of increased (Upper images) and decreased (Lower images) blood flow when verb generation (under Naive, Practiced, and Novel conditions) is compared with reading. During naive (Left images) and novel (Right images) verb generation, increased blood flow in left frontal cortex was found compared with simple reading, whereas decreased blood flow was observed in left insular cortex. The Center images show that blood flow in these areas changed to a level almost identical to that found during simple reading after the verb generation was practiced. A linear gray scale is used with white representing maximal activation and black, minimal activation. The brain outlines were traced from the stereotaxic atlas of Talairach and Tournoux (20) and represent sagittal sections with their x-axis (left–right axis, left being negative) positions in millimeters noted.
-
Figure 5
Maze and square designs used in the study. Arrows indicate the starting position for the tracing of each design. Shown are the mazes presented during right-hand performance. During left-hand performance, mirror images of the mazes were presented and tracing had to be done in a counterclockwise direction. Starting position for left-hand square tracing was at the lower right corner, with counterclockwise tracing.
-
Figure 7
PET difference (subtraction) images showing areas of increased (Upper images) and decreased (Lower images) blood flow when maze tracing (under Naive, Practiced, and Novel conditions) is compared with fast square tracing. During naive (Left images) and novel (Right images) maze tracing, increased blood flow in right premotor and parietal areas was found compared with square tracing, whereas decreased blood flow was observed in primary and supplementary motor cortex. The Center images show that blood flow in these areas changed to a level almost identical to that found during simple square tracing after the maze was practiced. A linear gray scale is used, with white representing maximal activation and black, minimal activation. The brain outlines were traced from the stereotaxic atlas of Talairach and Tournoux (20) and represent a transverse section 54 mm above the AC–PC line.
-
Figure 9
Absolute magnitudes in hypothetical brain areas (Upper three graphs) during the five tracing conditions minus the control rest condition and in brain areas of interest (Lower three graphs) in areas with activations related to velocity (A and B), to unskilled performance (C and D), and to skilled performance (E and F).
Footnotes
- Copyright © 1998, The National Academy of Sciences














