Double-strand breaks associated with repetitive DNA can reshape the genome

  1. Juan Lucas Argueso*,,,
  2. James Westmoreland,§,
  3. Piotr A. Mieczkowski*,
  4. Malgorzata Gawel*,
  5. Thomas D. Petes*,, and
  6. Michael A. Resnick§,
  1. *Department of Molecular Genetics and Microbiology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC 27710;
  2. Departamento de Genética e Evolução, Instituto de Biologia, Universidade Estadual de Campinas, Campinas, SP 13083-970, Brazil; and
  3. §Laboratory of Molecular Genetics, National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences, National Institutes of Health, Research Triangle Park, NC 27709
  1. Contributed by Thomas D. Petes, May 9, 2008

  2. J.L.A. and J.W. contributed equally to this work. (received for review March 10, 2008)

Abstract

Ionizing radiation is an established source of chromosome aberrations (CAs). Although double-strand breaks (DSBs) are implicated in radiation-induced and other CAs, the underlying mechanisms are poorly understood. Here, we show that, although the vast majority of randomly induced DSBs in G2 diploid yeast cells are repaired efficiently through homologous recombination (HR) between sister chromatids or homologous chromosomes, ≈2% of all DSBs give rise to CAs. Complete molecular analysis of the genome revealed that nearly all of the CAs resulted from HR between nonallelic repetitive elements, primarily Ty retrotransposons. Nonhomologous end-joining (NHEJ) accounted for few, if any, of the CAs. We conclude that only those DSBs that fall at the 3–5% of the genome composed of repetitive DNA elements are efficient at generating rearrangements with dispersed small repeats across the genome, whereas DSBs in unique sequences are confined to recombinational repair between the large regions of homology contained in sister chromatids or homologous chromosomes. Because repeat-associated DSBs can efficiently lead to CAs and reshape the genome, they could be a rich source of evolutionary change.

Footnotes

  • To whom correspondence may be addressed. E-mail: tom.petes{at}duke.edu or resnick{at}niehs.nih.gov
  • Author contributions: J.L.A., J.W., P.A.M., T.D.P., and M.R. designed research; J.L.A., J.W., P.A.M., and M.G. performed research; J.L.A., J.W., and P.A.M. analyzed data; and J.L.A., T.D.P., and M.R. wrote the paper.

  • The authors declare no conflict of interest.

  • Data deposition footnote: The complete set of microarray experiments has been deposited in the Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) database, www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo (accession nos. GSE6991 and GSE6984).

  • See Commentary on page 11593.

  • This article contains supporting information online at www.pnas.org/cgi/content/full/0804529105/DCSupplemental.

  • Freely available online through the PNAS open access option.

« Previous | Next Article »Table of Contents
OPEN ACCESS ARTICLE
From the Cover