Environmental, economic, and energetic costs and benefits of biodiesel and ethanol biofuels

Hill et al. 10.1073/pnas.0604600103.

Supporting Information

Files in this Data Supplement:

Supporting Table 1
Supporting Table 2
Supporting Table 3
Supporting Table 4
Supporting Table 5
Supporting Table 6
Supporting Text
Supporting Table 7
Supporting Table 8
Supporting Table 9
Supporting Table 10
Supporting Table 11





Supporting Text.

References for Tables 1–11.

1. U.S. Department of Agriculture National Agricultural Statistics Service (2004) Agricultural Chemical Usage 2003 Field Crops Summary (Dept. of Agriculture, Washington, DC).

2. Graboski, M. S. (2002) Fossil Energy Use in the Manufacture of Corn Ethanol (National Corn Growers Association, St. Louis, MO).

3. Shapouri, H., Duffield, J., McAloon, A. & Wang, M. (2004) The 2001 Net Energy Balance of Corn-Ethanol (Dept. of Agriculture, Washington, DC).

4. Wang, M., Saricks, C. & Wu, M. (1997) Fuel-Cycle Fossil Energy Use and Greenhouse Gas Emissions of Fuel Ethanol Produced from US Midwest Corn (Argonne Natl. Lab., Argonne, IL).

5. Patzek, T. W. (2004) Crit. Rev. Plant Sci. 23, 519–567.

6. Pimentel, D. (2003) Nat. Resources Res. 12, 127–134.

7. U.S. Department of Agriculture National Agricultural Statistics Service (2003) Crop Production 2002 Summary (Dept. of Agriculture, Washington, DC).

8. U.S. Department of Agriculture National Agricultural Statistics Service (2005) Crop Production 2004 Summary (Dept. of Agriculture, Washington, DC).

9. Tiffany, D. G. & Eidman, V. R. (2005) in Agriculture as a Producer and Consumer of Agriculture, eds. Outlaw, J., Collins, K. J. & Duffield, J. A. (CABI, Cambridge, MA).

10. Shapouri, H. & Gallagher, P. (2005) USDA’s 2002 Ethanol Cost-of-Production Survey (Dept. of Agriculture, Washington, DC), Agriculture Economic Rep. No. 841.

11. U.S. Department of Agriculture National Agricultural Statistics Service (2003) Agricultural Chemical Usage 2002 Field Crops Summary (Dept. of Agriculture, Washington, DC).

12. U.S. Department of Agriculture National Agricultural Statistics Service (2005) Agricultural Chemical Usage 2004 Field Crops Summary (Dept. of Agriculture, Washington, DC).

13. U.S. Department of Agriculture National Agricultural Statistics Service (2005) Agricultural Resource Management Survey: Crop Production Practices (Dept. of Agriculture, Washington, DC).

14. Sheehan, J., Camobreco, V., Duffield, J., Graboski, M. & Shapouri, H. (1998) Life Cycle Inventory of Biodiesel and Petroleum Diesel for Use in an Urban Bus (Natl. Renewable Energy Lab., Golden, CO), NREL Publ. No. SR-580-24089.

15. Helsel, Z. (1992) in Energy in Farm Production, ed. Fluck, R. C. (Elsevier, New York), pp. 177–201.

16. U.S. Department of Agriculture Economic Research Service (2004) Energy Use on Major Field Crops in Surveyed States (Dept. of Agriculture, Washington, DC).

17. de Beer, J., Worrell, E. & Blok, K. (1998) Annu. Rev. Energy Environ. 23, 123–205.

18. Fruehan, R. J., Fortini, O., Paxton, H. W. & Brindle, R. (2000) Theoretical Minimum Energies to Produce Steel for Selected Conditions (Dept. of Energy Office of Industrial Technologies, Washington, DC), OSTI ID 769470.

19. National Corn Growers Association (2005) 2005 World of Corn (Chesterfield, MO).

20. U.S. Department of Agriculture National Agricultural Statistics Service (2005) 2002 Census of Agriculture (Dept. of Agriculture, Washington, DC).

21. National Biodiesel Board (2006) Estimated U.S. Biodiesel Production (Natl. Biodiesel Board, Jefferson City, MO).

22. Fields, J. (2003) America’s Families and Living Arrangements: 2003 (Census Bureau, Washington, DC), Current Population Rep. No. P20-553.

23. Green, R. & Ahearn, M. C. (2005) Income and Wealth of Households Who Operate U.S. Farms. Presented at the Agricultural Outlook Forum, 2005, Arlington, VA.

24. BBI International (2001) East Kansas Agri-Energy Ethanol Plant Feasibility Study (East Kansas Agri-Energy, Garnett, KS).

25. Renewable Fuels Association (2005) Homegrown for the Homeland Ethanol Industry Outlook 2005 (Renewable Fuels Assoc., Washington, DC).

26. National Biodiesel Board (2005) Current and Proposed Biodiesel Production Plants – September 2005 (Natl. Biodiesel Board, Jefferson City, MO).

27. U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics (2006) Current Population Survey (Bureau of Labor Statistics, Washington, DC). Available at: www.bls.gov/cps/home.htm.

28. U.S. Department of Energy, Energy Information Administration (2005) Annual Energy Review 2004 (Dept. of Energy, Washington, DC), DOE Rep. No. EIA-0384(2004).

29. U.S. Census Bureau (2006) Population Estimates (Census Bureau, Washington, DC).

30. Wang, M., Saricks, C. & Santini, D. (1999) Effects of Fuel Ethanol Use on Fuel-Cycle Energy and Greenhouse Gas Emissions (Argonne Natl. Lab., Argonne, IL).

31. Delucchi, M. A. & Lipman, T. (2003) A Lifecycle Emissions Model (LEM): Lifecycle Emissions From Transportation Fuels, Motor Vehicles, Transportation Modes, Electricity Use, Heating and Cooking Fuels, and Materials (University of California, Davis), Institute of Transportation Studies Publ. No. UCD-ITS-RR-03-17A.

32. Glover, J., White, D. O. & Langrish, T. A. G. (2002) J. Forestry 100, 34–41.

33. Agricultural Utilization Research Institute (2002) Agricultural Renewable Solid Fuels Data (Agricultural Utilization Res. Inst., Waseca, MN).

34. Tiffany, D. G. (2005) Economic Analysis: Co-generation Using Wind and Biodiesel-Powered Generators (University of Minnesota, St. Paul), Dept. of Applied Economics Staff Paper No. P05-10.

35. Brinkman, N., Wang, M., Weber, T. & Darlington, T. (2005) Well-to-Wheels Analysis of Advanced Fuel/Vehicle Systems: A North American Study of Energy Use, Greenhouse Gas Emissions, and Criteria Pollutant Emissions (Argonne Natl. Lab., Argonne, IL).

36. Robertson, G. P., Paul, E. A. & Harwood, R. R. (2000) Science 289, 1922–1925.

This Article

  1. PNAS July 25, 2006 vol. 103 no. 30 11206-11210
  1. AbstractFree
  2. Figures Only
  3. Full Text
  4. Full Text (PDF)
  5. » Supporting Information