The maturing architecture of the brain's default network

  1. Damien A. Fair*,,
  2. Alexander L. Cohen,
  3. Nico U. F. Dosenbach,
  4. Jessica A. Church*,
  5. Francis M. Miezin*,,
  6. Deanna M. Barch,§,,
  7. Marcus E. Raichle*,,,,
  8. Steven E. Petersen*,,§,, and
  9. Bradley L. Schlaggar*,,,,**
  1. Departments of *Neurology,
  2. Radiology,
  3. §Psychology,
  4. Anatomy and Neurobiology,
  5. **Pediatrics, and
  6. Psychiatry, Washington University, St. Louis, MO 63110
  1. Contributed by Marcus E. Raichle, January 14, 2008 (received for review November 21, 2007)

  1. Fig. 1.

    Voxelwise resting-state functional connectivity maps for a seed region (solid black circle) in mPFC (ventral: −3, 39, −2). (A) Qualitatively, the rs-fcMRI map for the mPFC (ventral) seed region reveals the commonly observed adult connectivity pattern of the default network (9, 18, 19). The connectivity map in children, however, significantly deviates from that of the adults. Functional connections with regions in the posterior cingulate and lateral parietal regions (highlighted with blue open circles) are present in the adults but absent in children. (B) These qualitative differences between children and adults are confirmed by the direct comparison (random effects) between adults and children. mPFC (ventral) functional connections with the posterior cingulate and lateral parietal regions are significantly stronger in adults than children.


  2. Fig. 2.

    Correlation matrices representing default network functional connectivity for children and adults. Darker boxes represent low-correlation coefficients between regions, whereas lighter boxes represent stronger correlations. Qualitatively, adults have stronger correlation coefficients between regions of the default network than children do. The direct comparisons (see Fig. 3) between children and adults confirm this observation.


  3. Fig. 3.

    Graph visualization of the correlation matrices shown in Fig. 2 represented in a pseudoanatomical organization. Default regions (18) are only very sparsely connected in children aged 7–9 years. In adults aged 21–31 years, the default regions are highly integrated (strongly functionally connected). Only connections with r > 0.15 are shown at Left (line width is proportional to the connection strength). Statistically significant differences in functional connectivity between children and adults are highlighted on the Right. Blue lines represent significantly greater functional connectivity (r) in adults than in children. One connection (between superior frontal regions), although present in both groups, was significantly greater in children than in adults (red line). For the direct comparison, line width is proportional to the significance level (i.e., increased level of statistical significance; all lines meet P < 0.05 multiple comparisons corrected). Selected LOWESS curves for significant connections are also presented showing correlation coefficients (r) between regions as a function of age. For the full complement of LOWESS curves, see SI Fig. 4.


Footnotes

  • To whom correspondence may be addressed. E-mail: damien.fair{at}aya.yale.edu, marc{at}npg.wustl.edu, or schlaggarb{at}neuro.wustl.edu
« Previous | Next Article »Table of Contents
OPEN ACCESS ARTICLE